Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:32023R0657: Regulation (EU) 2023/657 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2023 laying down rules for the exercise of the Union’s rights in the implementation and enforcement of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

March 22, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:32023D0664: Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/664 of 21 March 2023 authorising the Italian Republic to apply a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/647

March 22, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:32023D0658: Council Decision (EU) 2023/658 of 23 January 2023 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles on access for Seychelles fishing vessels to the waters of Mayotte

March 22, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:32023D0663: Council Decision (EU) 2023/663 of 20 March 2023 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the WTO Committee on Government Procurement on the accession of the Republic of North Macedonia to the WTO Revised Agreement on Government Procurement (Text with EEA relevance)

March 22, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TJ0597: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission.#Case T-597/21.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0133: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-133/22.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TJ0727: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#TO v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Case T-727/21.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0194: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Zelmotor sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-194/22.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0178: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#FA World Entertainment Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-178/22.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0089: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Homy Casa Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-89/22.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0174: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Novartis AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-174/22.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0175: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Novartis AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-175/22.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0100: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 March 2023.#QB v Mercedes-Benz Group AG, anciennement Daimler AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Exhaust gas recirculation valve (EGR valve) – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Method of calculating compensation – Principle of effectiveness – Articl

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CO0580: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 January 2023.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-580/22 P.

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

Solidarnostni prispevek po ZNPOVCE

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

Solidarnostni prispevek po ZNPOVCE

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

Solidarnostni prispevek po ZNPOVCE

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

Solidarnostni prispevek po ZNPOVCE

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

Solidarnostni prispevek po ZNPOVCE

March 21, 2023 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1108/2020-7

Davčni organ ni obrazložil, zakaj asfaltno bazo šteje med gradbeno inženirske objekte. Tožnik je pojasnjeval in dokazoval, da je svojo asfaltno bazo kupil rabljeno ter jo dal prepeljati čez celo Evropo in jo nato postaviti v Sloveniji, česar davčni organ, ni problematiziral. Kot tožnik pravi v tožbi, je temeljna značilnost njegove asfaltne baze mobilnost. Kolikor pa je temu tako, po naziranju sodišča to pod vprašaj postavlja opredelitev tožnikove asfaltne baze kot gradbeno inženirskega objekta, ki jo davčni organ izvede zgolj na abstraktni ravni.
March 21, 2023 0 Comments
RSS
First9969979989991001100310041005Last