Modro poslovanje=varno in uspešno poslovanjehttps://modro-poslovanje.si:443/Sporočila/rss/522RSS document<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0410: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Vitabalans Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Ibumax-Lysin – Earlier Polish word mark ibum – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-410/25.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0410-judgment-of-the-general-court-sixth-chamber-of-15-april-2026vitabalans-oy-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-word-mark-ibumax-lysin-earlier-polish-word-mark-ibum-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-41025Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0410-judgment-of-the-general-court-sixth-chamber-of-15-april-2026vitabalans-oy-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-word-mark-ibumax-lysin-earlier-polish-word-mark-ibum-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-41025<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0476: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Serosan – Prior national word mark CLENOSAN – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-476/25.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0476-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-15-april-2026ionfarma-sl-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-word-mark-serosan-prior-national-word-mark-clenosan-relative-ground-for-refusal-no-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-47625Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0476-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-15-april-2026ionfarma-sl-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-word-mark-serosan-prior-national-word-mark-clenosan-relative-ground-for-refusal-no-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-47625<![CDATA[CELEX:62024TJ0479: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Stowarzyszenie Edukacja, Nauka, Kultura v European Research Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Grant agreement – TICASS project – Final audit report – Costs relating to seconded staff members – Ineligible costs – Letter confirming the recovery of part of the sums paid under the grant agreement – Debit note – Reclassification of the action – Recovery of sums paid – Legitimate expectations – Counterclaim.#Case T-479/24.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0479-judgment-of-the-general-court-tenth-chamber-of-15-april-2026stowarzyszenie-edukacja-nauka-kultura-v-european-research-executive-agencyarbitration-clause-research-and-technological-development-horizon-2020-framework-programme-for-research-and-innovation-2014-2020-grant-agreement-ticass-project-final-audit-report-costs-relating-to-seconded-staff-members-ineligible-costs-letter-confirming-the-recovery-of-part-of-the-sums-paid-under-the-grant-agreement-debit-note-reclassification-of-the-action-recovery-of-sums-paid-legitimate-expectations-counterclaimcase-t-47924Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0479-judgment-of-the-general-court-tenth-chamber-of-15-april-2026stowarzyszenie-edukacja-nauka-kultura-v-european-research-executive-agencyarbitration-clause-research-and-technological-development-horizon-2020-framework-programme-for-research-and-innovation-2014-2020-grant-agreement-ticass-project-final-audit-report-costs-relating-to-seconded-staff-members-ineligible-costs-letter-confirming-the-recovery-of-part-of-the-sums-paid-under-the-grant-agreement-debit-note-reclassification-of-the-action-recovery-of-sums-paid-legitimate-expectations-counterclaimcase-t-47924<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0190: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 April 2026.#A.K. and „Tabako lapai“ UAB v Lietuvos Respublikos generalinė prokuratūra.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco – Article 5(1) of Directive 2011/64/EU – Interpretation of the concept of ‘smoking tobacco’ – Consideration of the provisions of the combined nomenclature and explanatory notes – Validity – Legal certainty – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law.#Case T-190/25.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0190-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-extended-composition-of-15-april-2026ak-and-tabako-lapai-uab-v-lietuvos-respublikos-generalin%c4%97-prokurat%c5%abrareference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-taxation-excise-duties-excise-duty-applied-to-manufactured-tobacco-article-51-of-directive-201164eu-interpretation-of-the-concept-of-smoking-tobacco-consideration-of-the-provisions-of-the-combined-nomenclature-and-explanatory-notes-validity-legal-certainty-principle-that-offences-and-penalties-must-be-defined-by-lawcase-t-19025Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0190-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-extended-composition-of-15-april-2026ak-and-tabako-lapai-uab-v-lietuvos-respublikos-generalin%c4%97-prokurat%c5%abrareference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-taxation-excise-duties-excise-duty-applied-to-manufactured-tobacco-article-51-of-directive-201164eu-interpretation-of-the-concept-of-smoking-tobacco-consideration-of-the-provisions-of-the-combined-nomenclature-and-explanatory-notes-validity-legal-certainty-principle-that-offences-and-penalties-must-be-defined-by-lawcase-t-19025<![CDATA[CELEX:62024TJ0589: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 15 April 2026.#A-GmbH v Hauptzollamt C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Customs Code – Outward processing procedure – Authorisation – Fifth indent of Article 84(1)(b) and Article 85 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 211(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Placement for export at a customs office not designated in the authorisation and situated in a Member State other than that which granted the authorisation – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance – Relief – Article 86(6) of Regulation No 952/2013 – Customs debt incurred pursuant to Article 77(1)(a) of Regulation No 952/2013.#Case T-589/24.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0589-judgment-of-the-general-court-chamber-giving-preliminary-rulings-of-15-april-2026a-gmbh-v-hauptzollamt-creference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-customs-union-customs-code-outward-processing-procedure-authorisation-fifth-indent-of-article-841b-and-article-85-of-regulation-eec-no-291392-article-2111a-of-regulation-eu-no-9522013-placement-for-export-at-a-customs-office-not-designated-in-the-authorisation-and-situated-in-a-member-state-other-than-that-which-granted-the-authorisation-customs-debt-incurred-through-non-compliance-relief-article-866-of-regulation-no-9522013-customs-debt-incurred-pursuant-to-article-771a-of-regulation-no-9522013case-t-58924Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0589-judgment-of-the-general-court-chamber-giving-preliminary-rulings-of-15-april-2026a-gmbh-v-hauptzollamt-creference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-customs-union-customs-code-outward-processing-procedure-authorisation-fifth-indent-of-article-841b-and-article-85-of-regulation-eec-no-291392-article-2111a-of-regulation-eu-no-9522013-placement-for-export-at-a-customs-office-not-designated-in-the-authorisation-and-situated-in-a-member-state-other-than-that-which-granted-the-authorisation-customs-debt-incurred-through-non-compliance-relief-article-866-of-regulation-no-9522013-customs-debt-incurred-pursuant-to-article-771a-of-regulation-no-9522013case-t-58924<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0052:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 15 avril 2026.#Laboratorios ACPG, SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#* Langue de procédure : l’espagnol. Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative CAMALEON EL NATURALISTA – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative antérieure El Naturalista – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001».#Affaire T-52/25.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0052-arrêt-du-tribunal-cinquième-chambre-du-15-avril-2026laboratorios-acpg-sa-contre-office-de-lunion-européenne-pour-la-propriété-intellectuelle-langue-de-procédure-lespagnol-marque-de-lunion-européenne-procédure-dopposition-demande-de-marque-de-lunion-européenne-figurative-camaleon-el-naturalista-marque-de-lunion-européenne-figurative-antérieure-el-naturalista-motif-relatif-de-refus-absence-de-risque-de-confusion-article-8-paragraphe-1-sous-b-du-règlement-ue-20171001-affaire-t-5225Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0052-arrêt-du-tribunal-cinquième-chambre-du-15-avril-2026laboratorios-acpg-sa-contre-office-de-lunion-européenne-pour-la-propriété-intellectuelle-langue-de-procédure-lespagnol-marque-de-lunion-européenne-procédure-dopposition-demande-de-marque-de-lunion-européenne-figurative-camaleon-el-naturalista-marque-de-lunion-européenne-figurative-antérieure-el-naturalista-motif-relatif-de-refus-absence-de-risque-de-confusion-article-8-paragraphe-1-sous-b-du-règlement-ue-20171001-affaire-t-5225<![CDATA[CELEX:62024TJ0062: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Independent Farmers Organisation of Ireland Ltd v European Commission.#Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Registration of the name ‘Irish Grass Fed Beef’ – Opposition procedure – New scrutiny by the Commission following substantial amendments of the details published for the purposes of opposition – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Plea of illegality.#Case T-62/24.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0062-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-of-15-april-2026independent-farmers-organisation-of-ireland-ltd-v-european-commissionagriculture-protected-geographical-indications-registration-of-the-name-irish-grass-fed-beef-opposition-procedure-new-scrutiny-by-the-commission-following-substantial-amendments-of-the-details-published-for-the-purposes-of-opposition-right-to-be-heard-principle-of-good-administration-regulation-eu-no-11512012-plea-of-illegalitycase-t-6224Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0062-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-of-15-april-2026independent-farmers-organisation-of-ireland-ltd-v-european-commissionagriculture-protected-geographical-indications-registration-of-the-name-irish-grass-fed-beef-opposition-procedure-new-scrutiny-by-the-commission-following-substantial-amendments-of-the-details-published-for-the-purposes-of-opposition-right-to-be-heard-principle-of-good-administration-regulation-eu-no-11512012-plea-of-illegalitycase-t-6224<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0461: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Instanta sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LEONHART – Earlier national figurative mark EL LEON – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-461/25.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0461-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-15-april-2026instanta-sp-z-oo-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-the-eu-word-mark-leonhart-earlier-national-figurative-mark-el-leon-relative-ground-for-refusal-no-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-46125Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0461-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-15-april-2026instanta-sp-z-oo-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-the-eu-word-mark-leonhart-earlier-national-figurative-mark-el-leon-relative-ground-for-refusal-no-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-46125<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TC0397:           Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin M. Brkan vom 15. April 2026.###]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tc0397-schlussanträge-der-generalanwältin-m-brkan-vom-15-april-2026Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tc0397-schlussanträge-der-generalanwältin-m-brkan-vom-15-april-2026<![CDATA[CELEX:62023TJ0594: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#PS v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Change of place of employment – Conduct of the administration – Failure to comply with formal requirements – Partial inadmissibility – Liability.#Case T-594/23.]]>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62023tj0594-judgment-of-the-general-court-ninth-chamber-of-15-april-2026ps-v-european-external-action-servicecivil-service-members-of-the-contract-staff-change-of-place-of-employment-conduct-of-the-administration-failure-to-comply-with-formal-requirements-partial-inadmissibility-liabilitycase-t-59423Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:55:25 GMThttps://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62023tj0594-judgment-of-the-general-court-ninth-chamber-of-15-april-2026ps-v-european-external-action-servicecivil-service-members-of-the-contract-staff-change-of-place-of-employment-conduct-of-the-administration-failure-to-comply-with-formal-requirements-partial-inadmissibility-liabilitycase-t-59423