﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!--RSS Genrated: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:37:36 GMT--><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"><channel><title>Modro poslovanje=varno in uspešno poslovanje</title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si:443/Sporočila/rss/522</link><atom:link href="https://modro-poslovanje.si:443/Sporočila/rss/522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><description>RSS document</description><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024CO0111_RES: Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2026.##Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None.#Case C-111/24 P-OST.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024co0111-res-order-of-the-court-grand-chamber-of-6-october-2026article-155-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-failure-to-adjudicate-nonecase-c-11124-p-ost</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 12:13:15 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024co0111-res-order-of-the-court-grand-chamber-of-6-october-2026article-155-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-failure-to-adjudicate-nonecase-c-11124-p-ost</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350582]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024CO0111: Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2026.##Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None.#Case C-111/24 P-OST.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024co0111-order-of-the-court-grand-chamber-of-6-october-2026article-155-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-failure-to-adjudicate-nonecase-c-11124-p-ost</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 12:13:15 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024co0111-order-of-the-court-grand-chamber-of-6-october-2026article-155-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-failure-to-adjudicate-nonecase-c-11124-p-ost</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350581]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62026TJ0009_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Milestone Sportswear Handels GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MID season For When It’s Not Quite Cold Not Quite Warm – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-9/26.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62026tj0009-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-7-october-2026milestone-sportswear-handels-gmbh-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-invalidity-proceedings-eu-figurative-mark-mid-season-for-when-its-not-quite-cold-not-quite-warm-absolute-grounds-for-refusal-descriptive-character-lack-of-distinctiveness-article-71b-and-c-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-926</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62026tj0009-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-7-october-2026milestone-sportswear-handels-gmbh-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-invalidity-proceedings-eu-figurative-mark-mid-season-for-when-its-not-quite-cold-not-quite-warm-absolute-grounds-for-refusal-descriptive-character-lack-of-distinctiveness-article-71b-and-c-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-926</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350574]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0631_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2026.#Salumanus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark lightoptics – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of bad faith – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 60(2)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No earlier copyright acquired under national law.#Case T-631/25.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0631-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-ninth-chamber-of-7-october-2026salumanus-sp-z-oo-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-invalidity-proceedings-eu-figurative-mark-lightoptics-absolute-ground-for-invalidity-article-591b-of-regulation-eu-20171001-absence-of-bad-faith-relative-ground-for-invalidity-article-602c-of-regulation-20171001-no-earlier-copyright-acquired-under-national-lawcase-t-63125</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0631-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-ninth-chamber-of-7-october-2026salumanus-sp-z-oo-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-invalidity-proceedings-eu-figurative-mark-lightoptics-absolute-ground-for-invalidity-article-591b-of-regulation-eu-20171001-absence-of-bad-faith-relative-ground-for-invalidity-article-602c-of-regulation-20171001-no-earlier-copyright-acquired-under-national-lawcase-t-63125</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350573]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024TJ0175_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Özkan Demir Çelik Sanayi AŞ v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of steel bulb flats originating in China and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/209 – Article 2(10)(j) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Currency conversions – Article 2(4), (10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Ordinary course of trade – Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value – Quarterly dumping margin calculation).#Case T-175/24.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0175-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-ninth-chamber-of-2-september-2026özkan-demir-çelik-sanayi-aş-v-european-commissiondumping-imports-of-steel-bulb-flats-originating-in-china-and-türkiye-definitive-anti-dumping-duty-implementing-regulation-eu-2024209-article-210j-of-regulation-eu-20161036-currency-conversions-article-24-10-and-11-of-regulation-20161036-ordinary-course-of-trade-fair-comparison-between-the-export-price-and-the-normal-value-quarterly-dumping-margin-calculationcase-t-17524</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0175-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-ninth-chamber-of-2-september-2026özkan-demir-çelik-sanayi-aş-v-european-commissiondumping-imports-of-steel-bulb-flats-originating-in-china-and-türkiye-definitive-anti-dumping-duty-implementing-regulation-eu-2024209-article-210j-of-regulation-eu-20161036-currency-conversions-article-24-10-and-11-of-regulation-20161036-ordinary-course-of-trade-fair-comparison-between-the-export-price-and-the-normal-value-quarterly-dumping-margin-calculationcase-t-17524</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350572]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0574_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Nutristar SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark NUTRISTAR – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Declaration of revocation – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof.#Case T-574/25.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0574-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-of-9-september-2026nutristar-spa-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-revocation-proceedings-eu-figurative-mark-nutristar-genuine-use-of-the-trade-mark-article-581a-of-regulation-eu-20171001-declaration-of-revocation-assessment-of-the-evidence-unreasonable-or-excessive-burden-of-proofcase-t-57425</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0574-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-second-chamber-of-9-september-2026nutristar-spa-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-revocation-proceedings-eu-figurative-mark-nutristar-genuine-use-of-the-trade-mark-article-581a-of-regulation-eu-20171001-declaration-of-revocation-assessment-of-the-evidence-unreasonable-or-excessive-burden-of-proofcase-t-57425</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350571]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0564_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2026.#Heinz Reinwald and HK Evolution LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MAP – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Examination limited to the grounds and arguments submitted by the parties – Second sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-564/25.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0564-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-of-30-september-2026heinz-reinwald-and-hk-evolution-ltd-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-invalidity-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-word-mark-map-absolute-ground-for-invalidity-bad-faith-article-521b-of-regulation-ec-no-2072009-examination-limited-to-the-grounds-and-arguments-submitted-by-the-parties-second-sentence-of-article-951-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-56425</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0564-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-of-30-september-2026heinz-reinwald-and-hk-evolution-ltd-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-invalidity-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-word-mark-map-absolute-ground-for-invalidity-bad-faith-article-521b-of-regulation-ec-no-2072009-examination-limited-to-the-grounds-and-arguments-submitted-by-the-parties-second-sentence-of-article-951-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-56425</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350570]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0231_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Deva Holding Anonim Şirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Devatis – International registration of the earlier word mark NOVARTIS – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No link between the signs.#Case T-231/25.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0231-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-23-september-2026deva-holding-anonim-%c5%9firketi-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-figurative-mark-devatis-international-registration-of-the-earlier-word-mark-novartis-relative-ground-for-refusal-no-injury-to-reputation-article-85-of-regulation-eu-20171001-no-link-between-the-signscase-t-23125</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0231-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-23-september-2026deva-holding-anonim-%c5%9firketi-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-figurative-mark-devatis-international-registration-of-the-earlier-word-mark-novartis-relative-ground-for-refusal-no-injury-to-reputation-article-85-of-regulation-eu-20171001-no-link-between-the-signscase-t-23125</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350569]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0376_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-376/25.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0376-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-2-september-2026puma-se-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-design-invalidity-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-design-representing-a-footwear-sole-prior-eu-designs-grounds-for-invalidity-individual-character-different-overall-impression-degree-of-attention-of-an-informed-user-degree-of-freedom-of-the-designer-article-251b-and-article-61-of-regulation-ec-no-62002-in-the-version-prior-to-regulation-eu-20242822case-t-37625</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0376-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-seventh-chamber-of-2-september-2026puma-se-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-design-invalidity-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-design-representing-a-footwear-sole-prior-eu-designs-grounds-for-invalidity-individual-character-different-overall-impression-degree-of-attention-of-an-informed-user-degree-of-freedom-of-the-designer-article-251b-and-article-61-of-regulation-ec-no-62002-in-the-version-prior-to-regulation-eu-20242822case-t-37625</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350568]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025CJ0396_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Alexandra Molitorisová v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 7 – Request for access to documents relating to food additives and food enzymes – Partial refusal to examine the request for access due to the very large number of documents requested – Premature confirmatory application – No challengeable act – Action for annulment.#Case C-396/25 P.]]></title><link>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025cj0396-inf-judgment-of-the-court-sixth-chamber-of-4-june-2026alexandra-molitorisová-v-european-commissionappeal-access-to-documents-regulation-ec-no-10492001-article-7-request-for-access-to-documents-relating-to-food-additives-and-food-enzymes-partial-refusal-to-examine-the-request-for-access-due-to-the-very-large-number-of-documents-requested-premature-confirmatory-application-no-challengeable-act-action-for-annulmentcase-c-39625-p</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:13:10 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025cj0396-inf-judgment-of-the-court-sixth-chamber-of-4-june-2026alexandra-molitorisová-v-european-commissionappeal-access-to-documents-regulation-ec-no-10492001-article-7-request-for-access-to-documents-relating-to-food-additives-and-food-enzymes-partial-refusal-to-examine-the-request-for-access-due-to-the-very-large-number-of-documents-requested-premature-confirmatory-application-no-challengeable-act-action-for-annulmentcase-c-39625-p</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-350567]]></dc:identifier></item></channel></rss>