Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62020CJ0533: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62018CJ0529:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 24 mars 2022.#PJ contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Pourvoi – Principes du droit de l’Union – Article 19 du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne – Représentation des parties dans les recours directs devant les juridictions de l’Union – Avocat ayant la qualité de tiers par rapport à la partie requérante – Exigence d’indépendance – Avocat exerçant en tant que collaborateur dans un cabinet – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-529/18 P.

This document does not exist in English.
March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0130: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Lukáš Wagenknecht v European Commission.#Appeal – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Combating fraud – Multiannual Financial Framework – Alleged conflict of interest of the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic – Request to prevent the latter from meeting with the College of European Commissioners – Request to stop direct payments in the EU budget in favour of certain agri-food groups – Action for failure to act – Alleged failure to act by the European Commission – Composition of the General Court of the European Union – Alleged lack of impartiality – Application inadmissible – Definition of position – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-130/21 P.

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0433: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2 – Reproduction – Article 5(2)(b) – Private copying exception – Concept of ‘any medium’ – Servers owned by third parties made available to natural persons for private use – Fair compensation – National legislation that does not make the providers of cloud computing services subject to the private copying levy.#Case C-433/20.

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

Zavezancem za izvedbo pobota preveč plačanih davkov ni potrebno predložiti vloge

Upoštevajoč zgornje pojasnilo, zavezancem torej v primeru obveznosti iz naslova preplačila davkov ni potrebno podajati posebnih vlog za izvedbo pobota, saj davčni organ pobot izvede po uradni dolžnosti. Pri tem pojasnjujemo, da ne glede na dejanski datum izvedbe (knjiženja) pobota, zamudne obresti prenehajo teči z dnem steka pogojev za pobot. Prav tako so obveznosti za vračilo, tudi če pobot še ni bil izveden, upoštevane pri izračunu dolga v postopku izdaje potrdil in razkritij.

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

Zavezancem za izvedbo pobota preveč plačanih davkov ni potrebno predložiti vloge

Upoštevajoč zgornje pojasnilo, zavezancem torej v primeru obveznosti iz naslova preplačila davkov ni potrebno podajati posebnih vlog za izvedbo pobota, saj davčni organ pobot izvede po uradni dolžnosti. Pri tem pojasnjujemo, da ne glede na dejanski datum izvedbe (knjiženja) pobota, zamudne obresti prenehajo teči z dnem steka pogojev za pobot. Prav tako so obveznosti za vračilo, tudi če pobot še ni bil izveden, upoštevane pri izračunu dolga v postopku izdaje potrdil in razkritij.

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

Zavezancem za izvedbo pobota preveč plačanih davkov ni potrebno predložiti vloge

Upoštevajoč zgornje pojasnilo, zavezancem torej v primeru obveznosti iz naslova preplačila davkov ni potrebno podajati posebnih vlog za izvedbo pobota, saj davčni organ pobot izvede po uradni dolžnosti. Pri tem pojasnjujemo, da ne glede na dejanski datum izvedbe (knjiženja) pobota, zamudne obresti prenehajo teči z dnem steka pogojev za pobot. Prav tako so obveznosti za vračilo, tudi če pobot še ni bil izveden, upoštevane pri izračunu dolga v postopku izdaje potrdil in razkritij.

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

Zavezancem za izvedbo pobota preveč plačanih davkov ni potrebno predložiti vloge

Upoštevajoč zgornje pojasnilo, zavezancem torej v primeru obveznosti iz naslova preplačila davkov ni potrebno podajati posebnih vlog za izvedbo pobota, saj davčni organ pobot izvede po uradni dolžnosti. Pri tem pojasnjujemo, da ne glede na dejanski datum izvedbe (knjiženja) pobota, zamudne obresti prenehajo teči z dnem steka pogojev za pobot. Prav tako so obveznosti za vračilo, tudi če pobot še ni bil izveden, upoštevane pri izračunu dolga v postopku izdaje potrdil in razkritij.

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D0471: Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/471 of 23 March 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2022/338 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility for the supply to the Ukrainian Armed Forces of military equipment, and platforms, designed to deliver lethal force

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D0472: Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/472 of 23 March 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2022/339 on an assistance measure under the European Peace Facility to support the Ukrainian Armed Forces

March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32004R0851R(02)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D0060R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
March 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0757:           Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre élargie) du 23 mars 2022.#OT contre Parlement européen.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Sanction disciplinaire – Blâme – Article 21 bis du statut – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-757/20.

This document does not exist in English.
March 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TJ0587(01): Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#HM v European Commission.#Case T-587/16 RENV.

March 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62017TJ0147: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Nikolaos Anastassopoulos and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Case T-147/17.

March 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TJ0627(01): Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Case T-627/16 RENV.

March 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0661: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 March 2022 (Extracts).#NV v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Staff of eu-LISA – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Implementing provisions concerning administrative inquiries – Plea of illegality – Article 110 of the Staff Regulations – Failure to consult the Staff Committee – Rights of the defence and right to be heard – Articles 12, 12a, 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment – Principle of good administration – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Non-materia

March 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0689: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#HB v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dismissal – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Lack of competence of the author of the act.#Case T-689/20.

March 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TO0100: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament.#Case T-100/20.

March 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TO0208: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 October 2021.#JH v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case T-208/20.

March 23, 2022 0 Comments
RSS
First13781379138013811383138513861387Last