Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62019TO0480(03):           Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre élargie) du 10 juin 2025.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour 2019 – Obligation de motivation – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Égalité de traitement – Principe de proportionnalité – Marge d’appréciation du CRU – Exception d’illégalité – Marge d’appréciation de la Commission – Article 70, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-480/19.

This document does not exist in English.
June 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62019TO0479(03):           Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre élargie) du 10 juin 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Union économique et monétaire – Union bancaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement (MRU) – Fonds de résolution unique (FRU) – Décision du CRU sur le calcul des contributions ex ante pour 2019 – Détermination du niveau cible annuel – Plafond prévu à l’article 70, paragraphe 2, premier et quatrième alinéas, du règlement (UE) no 806/2014 – Obligation de motivation – Droit d’être entendu – Principe de sécurité juridique – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Exception d’illégalité – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-

This document does not exist in English.
June 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62018TO0414(04):           Beschluss des Gerichts (Zehnte erweiterte Kammer) vom 10. Juni 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG gegen Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss.#Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion – Bankenunion – Einheitlicher Abwicklungsmechanismus für Kreditinstitute und bestimmte Wertpapierfirmen (SRM) – Einheitlicher Abwicklungsfonds (SRF) – Beschluss des SRB über die Berechnung der für 2018 im Voraus erhobenen Beiträge – Bestimmung der jährlichen Zielausstattung – Obergrenze nach Art. 70 Abs. 2 Unterabs. 1 und 4 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 806/2014 – Begründungspflicht – Anspruch auf rechtliches Gehör – Grundsatz der Rechtssicherheit – Anspruch auf effektiven gerichtlichen Rechtsschutz – Einrede der Rechtswidrigkeit – Klage, der offensichtlich jede rechtliche Grundlage fehlt.#Rechtssac

This document does not exist in English.
June 22, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0288_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Case T-288/22.

June 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0332_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Azaconsa SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-332/23.

June 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0615: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 June 2025.#Asociación de ciudadanos contra la corrupción y para la defensa del estado de derecho v European Ombudsman.#Action for annulment – Decision of the Ombudsman not to open an inquiry following a complaint – Act not open to challenge – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Manifest inadmissibility in part.#Case T-615/24.

June 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0465_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Crescenzio Rivellini v European Parliament.#Case T-465/23.

June 21, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0509(01)_RES: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2025.#Research Investments s. r. o. and Others v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Letters from the European Delegated Prosecutor – Article 42(1) to (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-509/24.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0264_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 September 2024.#MH v BR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu.#Case C-264/24.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0509: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#SIA „Laimz” v Izložu un azartspēļu uzraudzības inspekcija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Point 11(a) of Article 3 – Close associate of a politically exposed person – Definition – Article 45(1) and (8) – Obliged entities that are part of a group – Information sharing within the group – Application of decisions taken by another obliged entity that is part of that group – Article 14(1) and (8) – Ongoing monitoring of customers by obliged entities – Article 11(d) – Enhanced customer due diligence measures for providers of gambling services.#Case C-509/23.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0741_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0396: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#PU and Others v mBank S.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.#Case C-396/24.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0671: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#M v Lietuvos bankas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Article 59 – Concept of ‘systematic infringement’ – Penalties – National legislation or national practice allowing a separate fine to be imposed in respect of each infringement established in the course of one and the same investigation – Compatibility with EU law – Minimum harmonisation – Observance of the general principles of EU law – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions – Principle ne bis in idem.#Case C-671/23.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0323: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 19 June 2025.###

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0184: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 19 June 2025.###

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0200: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 8(1) – Commercial communications service provided by a member of a regulated profession – National legislation prohibiting advertising for pharmacies and pharmaceutical outlets as well as for the activities thereof – Restriction – Whether justified – Protection of public health.#Case C-200/24.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0419: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Société Nouvelle de l’Hôtel Plaza SAS v YG and Pôle emploi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1), first subparagraph, (a) – Concept of ‘workers normally employed’ – Workers supplied by an external undertaking under a contract for the provision of services – Method of calculating the number of those workers in the establishment – No specific obligation imposed by that directive in respect of a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings – Inapplicability of that directive – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-419/24.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0804(02): Order of the Court of 12 June 2025.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-804/24 P.

June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0134:           Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 10 juin 2025.#Blue Underwriting Agency SpA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-134/25 P.

This document does not exist in English.
June 20, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0320: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 19 June 2025.###

June 20, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First45679111213Last