Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62022CJ0389:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 25 janvier 2024.#GC e.a. contre Croce Rossa Italiana e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Portée de l’obligation de renvoi des juridictions nationales statuant en dernier ressort – Exceptions à cette obligation – Critères – Situations dans lesquelles l’interprétation correcte du droit de l’Union s’impose avec une telle évidence qu’elle ne laisse place à aucun doute raisonnable – Condition pour la juridiction nationale statuant en dernier ressort d’être convaincue que la même évidence s’imposerait également aux autres juridictions de dernier ressort des États membres et à la Cour – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clauses 2 et 3 – Notion de “travailleur à dur

This document does not exist in English.
January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CC0743: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 25 January 2024.###

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CC0622: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 January 2024.###

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CC0436: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 25 January 2024.###

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CC0160:           Conclusions de l'avocat général Mme J. Kokott, présentées le 25 janvier 2024.###

This document does not exist in English.
January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CC0757:           Conclusions de l'avocat général M. J. Richard de la Tour, présentées le 25 janvier 2024.###

This document does not exist in English.
January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CC0753

This document does not exist in English.
January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CC0027: Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 25 January 2024.###

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0687:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 25 janvier 2024.#BL contre MediaMarktSaturn Hagen-Iserlohn GmbH, anciennement Saturn Electro-Handelsgesellschaft mbH Hagen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Interprétation des articles 5, 24, 32 et 82 – Appréciation de la validité de l’article 82 – Irrecevabilité de la demande en appréciation de validité – Droit à réparation du dommage causé par le traitement de telles données effectué en violation de ce règlement – Transmission de données à un tiers non autorisé en raison d’une erreur commise par des employés du responsable du traitement – Appréciation du caractère approprié des mesures de protection mises en œuv

This document does not exist in English.
January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CC0112:           Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts P. Pikamäe vom 25. Januar 2024.###

This document does not exist in English.
January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0438: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Em akaunt BG ЕООD v Zastrahovatelno aktsionerno druzhestvo Armeets AD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Setting of minimum fee amounts by a lawyers’ professional organisation – Decision by an association of undertakings – Court prohibited from ordering reimbursement of fees in an amount less than those minimum amounts – Restriction of competition – Justifications – Legitimate objectives – Quality of the services provided by the lawyers – Implementation of the judgment of 23 November 2017, CHEZ Elektro Bulgaria and FrontEx International (C‑427/16 and C‑428/16, EU:C:2017:890) – Whether the Wouters case-law may be relied on in a sit

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0277: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Global NRG Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Zrt. v Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 41(17) – Natural gas transmission system – National regulatory authority – Fixing of system usage charges and connection fees – Fixing of remuneration for any services provided by the system operator – Concept of ‘a party affected by a decision of a regulatory authority’ – Appeal against that decision – Right to an effective remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-277/22.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0058: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#NR v Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Craiova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Criminal proceedings brought in rem – Order that no further action be taken adopted by a public prosecutor’s office – Admissibility of later criminal proceedings brought in personam in respect of the same facts – Conditions to be satisfied for it to be held that a person has been finally acquitted or convicted – Requirement for a detailed investigation – No interview of a potential witness – No interview of the person concerned as a ‘suspect’.#Case C-58/22.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0722: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, justice and security – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Third indent of Article 1 – Concept of ‘instrumentality’ – Article 2(1) – Obligation for Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities from criminal offences – Vehicle used to transport excise goods without a tax marking in breach of the law.#Case C-722/22.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0055: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-55/23.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0201: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#TA Towers ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-201/22.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TJ0495: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Case T-495/21.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0603: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Agus sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-603/22.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0202: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#TA Towers ApS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-202/22.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0537: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 January 2024.#Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-537/22.

January 26, 2024 0 Comments
RSS
First663664665666668670671672Last