Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62024CO0360_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#Yeguada de Milagro, SA v Tribunal Constitucional.#Case C-360/24 P.

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CO0658_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2024.#Investcapital Ltd v TK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 3 Bucureşti.#Case C-658/23.

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0511_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 September 2024.#Aylo Freesites LTD v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Additional online advertising transparency – Decision to designate as a very large online platform – Action for annulment – Balancing of competing interests.#Case C-511/24 P(R).

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0295_INF: Order of the Court of 4 July 2024.#Thomas Henry GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-295/24 P.

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CO0651_INF:           Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 19 février 2024.#Okan Balaban contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-651/23 P.

This document does not exist in English.
February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0334_INF: Order of the Court of 3 September 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-334/24 P.

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0012_INF:           Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 8 avril 2024.#Sattvica SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-12/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TB0476(01): Case T-476/24: Order of the General Court of 26 November 2024 – Manders v Parliament

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0617: Case T-617/24: Action brought on 29 November 2024 – Nokia v EUIPO – Nooka Space (nooka your space)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0642: Case T-642/24: Action brought on 10 December 2024 – Eurest Colectividades v EUIPO – Fish Tales (FISH REVOLUTION)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0628: Case T-628/24: Action brought on 5 December 2024 – Lego v EUIPO – Guangdong Qman Toys Industry (Building blocks from a toy building set)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0619: Case T-619/24: Action brought on 3 December 2024 – Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group v EUIPO – Kamstar (Kimkom)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0621: Case T-621/24: Action brought on 3 December 2024 – Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group v EUIPO – Kamstar (Kimsum)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0618: Case T-618/24: Action brought on 3 December 2024 – Athom v EUIPO – Chuhaiya E-Commerce (Shenzhen) (athom Smart Home)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0614: Case T-614/24, AROCO: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 13 November 2024 – AROCO, spol. s r.o. v Generální ředitelství cel

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0641: Case T-641/24: Action brought on 10 December 2024 – Heinrich Sieber & Co. v EUIPO – Achilles (Shopping bags)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0597: Case T-597/24: Action brought on 22 November 2024 – Khudaynatov v Council

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0610: Case T-610/24: Action brought on 25 November 2024 – Banco Santander v ECB

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TN0595: Case T-595/24: Action brought on 22 November 2024 – Capgemini España and UniSystems Luxembourg v EUIPO

February 3, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TA0464: Case T-464/23: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Lidl Digital International v EUIPO – Ningbo Hanyuan Lighting (Lamp) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a lamp – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Duty to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002)

February 3, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First209210211212214216217218Last