Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:32025D0690: Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/690 of 4 April 2025 amending Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran

April 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0350_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2025 (Extracts).#Rems Kargins v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – State aid – Intervention of the Commission as amicus curiae before a national court – Unlawfulness of the conduct alleged against the EU institution – Plea of illegality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Article 29(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Principles of separation of powers, independence of national courts, right to an effective remedy, impartiality and neutrality.#Case T-350/23.

April 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0086: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 April 2025.#Maurice Taylor v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Rectification of the contested acts – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-86/25 R.

April 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0018: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 April 2025.#Apellis Europe BV v European Commission.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for Syfovre – Pegcetacoplan – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-18/25 R.

April 5, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sklep X DoR 38/2024-12

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali se lahko v verigi tristranskih poslov dobavitelj (drugi v verigi) blaga, ki je bilo z enim prevozom dobavljeno (tj. dano na razpolago oziroma v last) kupčevemu kupcu (in ne tretjemu v verigi), lahko sklicuje na administrativno poenostavitev za tristranske posle iz četrtega odstavka 23. člena ter 48. in 76. člena ZDDV-1 oziroma iz 42., 141. in 197. člena Direktive o DDV?
April 4, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sklep I U 1166/2018-29

V zadevi je prišlo do očitne pomote, ker v I. točki izreka sodbe ni bilo dostavka, da se odprava in vrnitev v ponovni postopek nanaša le na obrestni del izpodbijane odločbe. Pri tem pa je bilo že iz obrazložitve sodbe razvidno, da odločitev sodišča temelji izključno na očitku napačne uporabe materialnega prava zaradi obračuna obresti po 7 % letni obrestni meri namesto po predhodno veljavni, nižji obrestni meri. Volja sodišča, da izpodbijano odločbo odpravi v obrestnem delu, je bila torej jasna, vendar je bilo to v izreku pomotoma izpuščeno.
April 4, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 884/2021

V zadevi tako ni sporno, da tožnik ni izkazal, da je bilo blago dostavljeno neposredno tožnikovemu kupcu oziroma dobavljeno prejemniku nadalje dobave, kot je to tožnik poročal, torej neposredno tretjemu v verigi. Tako sta bili znotraj enega prevoza, opravljeni več kot dve dobavi, dejanski pridobitelji blaga namreč niso bili tožnikovi kupci, temveč njihovi kupci (kupci kupcev oziroma četrti v verigi), zato tudi po presoji sodišča niso bile izpolnjene vsebinske zahteve za uporabo administrativne poenostavitve za tristranske posle in posledično za oprostitev obravnavanih transakcij tožnika na Danskem kot pridobitev blaga znotraj Unije.
April 4, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1290/2021-9

Do odloga ugotavljanja davčne obveznosti pride torej zgolj pod pogojem, da davčni zavezanec opcijo odloga izbere in svojo izbiro priglasi davčnemu organ po pravilnih davčnega postopka in v predpisanem roku, davčni organ pa v davčnem postopku z odločbo ugotovi izpolnjenost pogojev in s tem prizna pravico do odloga. Že iz jezikovne razlage prvega do četrtega odstavka 331. člena ZDavP-2, izhaja, da gre za dva ločena in alternativna postopka. Davčni zavezanec torej vloži davčno napoved ali vlogo za odlog ugotavljanja davčne obveznosti, vse v predpisanem roku. Ker gre pri odločanju o odlogu ugotavljanja davčne obveznosti za samostojen postopek, je tudi rok za vložitev vloge za uveljavljanje odloga samostojen.
April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0560_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV v European Commission.#Case T-560/22.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0235_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Case T-235/22.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0798_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Case T-798/22.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1099_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Ruiz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-1099/23.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0073_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Tertianum AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark TERTIANUM – International registration of the earlier figurative mark Tertianum WOHNEN UND LEBEN IM DRITTEN ALTER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Nature of use – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-73/23.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0473_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 10 juillet 2024.#Bartex Bartol sp. z o.o sp. k. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale duch puszczy – Cause de nullité absolue – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Article 52, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement no 207/2009 – Article 95, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Article 16, paragraphe 2, du règlement délégué (UE) 2018/625.#Affaire T-473/23.

This document does not exist in English.
April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0166_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Dekoback GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DECOPAC – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-166/23.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CC0726:           Conclusions de l'avocat général M. J. Richard de la Tour, présentées le 3 avril 2025.###

This document does not exist in English.
April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CC0641: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 3 April 2025.###

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0541_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2024.#Laura Food Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-541/23.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0497_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2024.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HYALERA – Earlier national word mark HYAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-497/23.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0743: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#Minister for Justice and Equality v MA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for criminal prosecution – Risk of breach of a fundamental right – Second sentence of Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Changes, to the detriment of the sentenced person, to the licence regime.#Case C-743/24.

April 4, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First107108109110112114115116Last