Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62024CC0244:           Conclusions de l'avocat général M. J. Richard de la Tour, présentées le 22 octobre 2024.###

This document does not exist in English.
October 23, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0652: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 October 2024.#Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v Državna komisija za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 43 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right on the part of those economic operators to ‘no less favourable’ treatment – Participation of such an economic operator in a public procurement procedure – Inapplicability of Directive 2014/25 – Inadmissibility in the context of an action brought by that economic operator seeking a request for a preliminary

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022CJ0652_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 October 2024.#Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v Državna komisija za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 43 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right on the part of those economic operators to ‘no less favourable’ treatment – Participation of such an economic operator in a public procurement procedure – Inapplicability of Directive 2014/25 – Inadmissibility in the context of an action brought by that economic operator seeking a request for a prelimin

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

Nadzor dodatnega blaga na področju dvojne rabe

Slovenija je ta nadzor uredila z uporabo catch-all mehanizma po 10. členu Uredbe (EU) 2021/821 in z nacionalno zakonodajo, z namenom uskladitve nadzora med državami članicami EU. Več informacij o tej zadevi je dosegljivih na spletni strani ministrstva, pristojnega za gospodarstvo.

October 23, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:32024R1183R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
October 23, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TO0729_RES:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 17 octobre 2024.#Complejo Agrícola Las Lomas, SL contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Agriculture – Plan stratégique relevant de la politique agricole commune (PAC) – Règlement (UE) 2021/2115 – Règles régissant l’aide aux plans stratégiques établis par les États membres dans le cadre de la PAC – Approbation de la Commission – Procédure administrative composite ou complexe – Compétence du Tribunal – Recevabilité – Respect du délai de recours – Prise de connaissance de l’acte attaqué – Qualité pour agir.#Affaire T-729/22.

This document does not exist in English.
October 22, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:32024D2734: Council Decision (EU) 2024/2734 of 21 October 2024 on the financial contributions to be paid by the parties to the European Development Fund as a third instalment for 2024

October 22, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:32024D2723: Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2723 of 21 October 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110 on the European Union CSDP Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUAM RCA)

October 22, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:32024D2722: Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2722 of 21 October 2024 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi

October 22, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:32024R2509R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
October 22, 2024 0 Comments

Nova napredna oprema za učinkovitejše carinske preglede

October 21, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0062: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 October 2024.#ST v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Right to asylum – Activities by Frontex in the Aegean Sea – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – Article 46 – Margin of discretion – Action for failure to act – Invitation to act submitted in the name and on behalf of an anonymous person – Decision refusing the invitation to act before the action for failure to act was brought – Manifest inadmissibility – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Annulment not capable of securing a benefit for the applicant – Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.#Case C-62/24 P.

October 21, 2024 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TA0059: Case T-59/22: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Conserve Italia and Conserves France v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for canned vegetables – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Gravity and duration of the infringement – Fine – Basic amount – Additional amount for deterrence – Legal upper limit of the fine – Concept of an undertaking – Concept of an association of undertakings – Relevant turnover – Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

October 21, 2024 0 Comments
RSS
First324325326327329331332333Last