Vrsta AI: Disclaimer AI Kaj prejmete
AI Davčni Asistent: modro-poslovanje.si

Problemi z davčnim postopkom, vodenje poslovnih? knjig....pridobite nasvet ali ponudbo za vodenje poslovnih knjig ali pomoč pri preoblikovanju podjetja (normiranec, lmet, zavod, d.o.o.....), inšpekcije....

AI Davki/Računovodstvo

Problemi z razumevanjem davkov, prispevkov?....svetovalec potrdi odgovor na vprašanja o DAVKIH - AI modri davčni nasvet pa naredi (Povzetek → Razlaga → Koraki → Viri. in Potrditev odgovora s strani Derganc Franc)

 (Rezervirajte termin pri DAVČNEM SVETOVALCU - mag. Franc Derganc)

Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:32022D0010R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32003R1831R(08)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D0014R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32019L1023R(02)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32021R2115R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32009R0160R(02)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32009D0937R(08)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:31968R0259R(04)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32003L0086R(04)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32019R1010R(02)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32004R0723R(09)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32017R1939R(05)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32021R1060R(03)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32020L0262R(05)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32019L1159R(03)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32013R0952R(11)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32016R0429R(08)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32014L0059R(16)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 24, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62021CO0611: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 11 February 2022.#Lajos Bese v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-611/21 P.

February 23, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62017TJ0834: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – Rights of the defence – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link.#Case T-834/17.

February 23, 2022 0 Comments
RSS
First17091710171117121714171617171718Last