Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62017CO0558: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2022.#OZ v European Investment Bank.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-558/17 P-DEP.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62018TJ0671: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#ZU v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Transfer in the interests of the service – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Article 25 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence and the right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration and duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – 2017 appraisal exercise – Appraisal report – 2018 promotion exercise – Proposed non-promotion – Liability.#Joined Cases T-671/18 and T-140/19.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62021CO0678: Order of the Court of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62019TO0866: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2021.#Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 – Rules on the distribution of air traffic between Schiphol and Lelystad Airports – Priority for the allocation of slots to Lelystad Airport – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Not individually concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-866/19.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62019TO0777(04): Order of the General Court of 2 July 2021.#David Bourel and Others v European Commission.#Case T-777/19 R.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0225: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Case T-225/20.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TO0634: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 July 2021.#Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Case T-634/20.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TO0760: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 August 2021.#Stasys Jakeliūnas v European Securities and Markets Authority.#Case T-760/20.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TJ0076: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-76/21.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0267: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Case T-267/20.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TO0645: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 July 2021.#Dual Star Logistic SRL and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Road transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Conditions relating to the requirement of establishment of undertakings – Return of vehicles to the operational centre in the Member State of origin within a maximum period of eight weeks – Professional association – Standing to bring proceedings – Act not of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-645/20.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TO0249: Order of the President of the General Court of 28 July 2021.#SN v European Parliament.#Interim measures – Member of the European Parliament – Recovery of allowances paid by way of reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility – No urgency.#Case T-249/21 R.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TO0534: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 November 2021.#VP v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.#Interim relief – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Application for interim measures – Inadmissibility.#Case T-534/21 R.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0224: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#FT and Others v European Commission.#Case T-224/20.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TO0743: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 January 2022.#Car-Master 2 sp. z o.o. sp.k. v European Commission.#Case T-743/20.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

Prenovljen slovenski avtomatiziran uvozni sistem (SIAIS2)

 

 

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 931/2021-8

Odločanje v ponovljenem postopku ne pomeni, da se postopek začne na novo, temveč, da se nadaljuje tam, kjer je bil pred izdajo prve odločbe tožene stranke. Navedeno za obravnavani primer pomeni, da bi se morala tožena stranka v izpodbijani odločbi opredeliti do tožnikovih ugovorov, da gre le za občasne prejemke ter tudi do predlaganega dokaza po opravi poizvedb pri tožnikovemu delodajalcu. Po presoji sodišča bi morala tožena stranka z opravo poizvedb pri tožnikovemu delodajalcu oziroma na drug ustrezen način ugotoviti dejansko stanje, ki v predmetni zadevi očitno ostaja sporno.
March 4, 2022 0 Comments

Seznam oseb, ki so pridobile status pooblaščenega tujega posrednika

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

Nedelovanje storitev G2G, 10. 3. 2022

Storitve G2G bodo v četrtek, 10. 3. 2022, od 13.00 do predvidoma 18.00 zaradi tehničnega vzdrževanja izmenjav nedelujoče.

Hvala za razumevanje.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments

Nedelovanje storitev G2G, 10. 3. 2022

Storitve G2G bodo v četrtek, 10. 3. 2022, od 13.00 do predvidoma 18.00 zaradi tehničnega vzdrževanja izmenjav nedelujoče.

Hvala za razumevanje.

March 4, 2022 0 Comments
RSS
First13981399140014011403140514061407Last