Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:32023D0221(01): Council Decision of 14 February 2023 appointing one alternate member of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Italy 2023/C 64/05

February 21, 2023 0 Comments

Odkrita proizvodnja drobno rezanega tobaka na območju Žalca

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

VSRS Sodba in sklep II Ips 43/2022

Nedopustna je razlaga dvoumnih, nerazumljivih ali nelogičnih izrekov s pomočjo razlogov sodbe, ki lahko vodi do različnih rezultatov, še toliko bolj v tem primeru, ko si pravdni stranki in intervenient vsak v svoj prid razlagajo odločitev oziroma obseg odločitve sodišča druge stopnje. Vrhovno sodišče je ob prejšnjem odločanju o predlogih za revizijo in revizijah zavzelo stališče, da je bil ob prvem odločanju pritožbenega sodišča razveljavljen celoten zavrnilni del prvostopenjske sodbe, zato tožničinih izrednih pravnih sredstev zoper odločbo druge stopnje ni vsebinsko obravnavalo. S spremembo dosedanjega stališča pa bi bil prav zaradi nedoslednosti (dvoumnosti) izreka odločbe pritožbenega sodišča tožnici sploh onemogočen preizkus zavrnilnega dela odločitve pred Vrhovnim sodiščem in s tem poseženo v njeno pravico do poštenega sojenja. Odmera odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo zaradi nezakonitega pridržanja v psihiatrični bolnici.
February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TB0110: Case T-110/22: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Kremer v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Retirement pensions — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Action for annulment — Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a bonus — Time limit for complaints — Undue enrichment — Manifest inadmissibility)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TB0111: Case T-111/22: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Baert v Commission (Civil service — Retirement pension — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Crediting of additional years of pensionable service — Action for annulment — Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a crediting of additional years — Time limit for complaints — Unjust enrichment — Manifest inadmissibility)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TB0116: Case T-116/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 November 2022 — Belavia v Council (Interim relief — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TB0721: Case T-721/21: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2022 — Sunrise Medical and Sunrise Medical Logistics v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff heading — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TB0751: Case T-751/21: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2022 — EMS v EUIPO (AIRFLOW) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AIRFLOW — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TB0052: Case T-52/20: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — CX v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal from post — Reinstatement decision — Application for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Claim for compensation — Loss of opportunity for promotion — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TB0735: Case T-735/16: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — CX v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal from post — Decision to reduce the remuneration of the applicant — No need to adjudicate)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TA0046: Case T-46/22: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Esedra v Parliament (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Full management of the Parliament’s early childhood centre in Brussels — Rejection of a tenderer’s tender — Abnormally low tender — Compliance of a tender with the conditions laid down in the specifications — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest errors of assessment)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TA0018: Case T-18/22: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ v EUIPO — Newport Europe (NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ — Earlier EU word mark Newport — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0636: Case T-636/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Eurol v EUIPO — Pernsteiner (eurol LUBRICANTS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark eurol LUBRICANTS — Earlier national word mark EUROLLUBRICANTS — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Use with the trade mark proprietor’s consent — No alteration of distinctive character — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0553: Case T-553/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Agrarfrost v EUIPO — McCain (Shape of a smiley) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a smiley — Genuine use of the mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Nature of use — No alteration of distinctive character)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0530: Case T-530/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Pierre Lannier v EUIPO — Pierre Lang Trading (PL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ — Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Locus standi — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0490: Case T-490/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Vanhoudt v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Rejection of application — Appointment of another candidate — Obligation to state reasons — Irregularity in the recruitment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Liability)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0440: Case T-440/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — TM v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Procedure for filling a post of [confidential information redacted] — Selection criteria — Professional experience — Rejection of application — Appointment of another candidate — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Interests of the service — Liability — Material and non-material damage)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0358: Case T-358/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Hotel Cipriani v EUIPO — Altunis (CIPRIANI FOOD) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark CIPRIANI FOOD — Genuine use of a mark — Nature of use — Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Extent of use — Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0346: Case T-346/21: Judgment of the General Court of 11 January 2023 — Hecht Pharma v EUIPO — Gufic BioSciences (Gufic) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Gufic — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Public and outward use — Extent of use — Nature and form of use — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TA0312: Case T-312/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — SY v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Open Competition EPSO/AD/374/19 — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list — Action for annulment — Amendment of the notice of competition after a part of the admission tests have been carried out — Lack of legal basis — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Force majeure — Equal treatment — Entitlement to special arrangements — Organisation of the tests remotely — High pass rate of internal candidates — Action for failure to act)

February 20, 2023 0 Comments
RSS
First10321033103410351037103910401041Last