Išči

Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA

Spoštovani, vse pravice plačnikov davkov, kot so opisane v tem prispevku, so opredeljene v Ustavi Republike Slovenije (in Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah, Evropski konvenciji za človekove pravice ipd.). Slovenija nima uvedenega Kodeksa pravic plačnikov davkov (in določene pravice udejanja pomanjkljivo), zato je sistematika PPD na našem spletnem mestu urejena po kanadskem modelu. Zato (ker imamo težave na nivoju zakonov in na nivoju izvjanja zakonov) lahko določene pravice (npr. p. do zasebnosti) udejanjamo zgolj na podlagi vložitve pravnih sredstev.

Link: KODEKS ZA PRAVICE PLAČNIKOV DAVKOV ZDSS, ki ga je sprejela Zbornica davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije
s ciljem spodbujanja odločevalcev pri nas, da zberejo pogum in uvedejo Kodeks - tudi za slovenske plačnike davkov.

 

Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij
0 0

CELEX:62021TA0100: Case T-100/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Sánchez-Gavito León v Council and Commission (International Cotton Advisory Committee — Decision (EU) 2017/876 — Staff of an international organisation to which the European Union has acceded — Agreement on the applicant’s conditions of departure — Actions for failure to act — Absence in part of invitation to act — No standing to bring proceedings — Inadmissibility — Liability — Causal link)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0103: Case T-103/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0104: Case T-104/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Kande Mupompa v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0105: Case T-105/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Kanyama v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0106: Case T-106/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Kazembe Musonda v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0107: Case T-107/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Amisi Kumba v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0108: Case T-108/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Ilunga Luyoyo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0109: Case T-109/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Mutondo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0110: Case T-110/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Kampete v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0111: Case T-111/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Croatia Airlines; COVID-19) (State aid — Croatian air transport market — Aid granted by Croatia to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — Direct grant — Decision not to raise any objections — Action for annulment — Individual concern — Admissibility — Serious difficulties — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Free provision of services — Assessment of the damage — Obligation to state reasons)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0112: Case T-112/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Numbi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0118: Case T-118/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Cilem Records International v EUIPO — KVZ Music (HALIX RECORDS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS — Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0119: Case T-119/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Ramazazni Shadary v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0120: Case T-120/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Ruhorimbere v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0125: Case T-125/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Banco de Investimento Global v EUIPO — Banco BIC Português (EUROBIC) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark EUROBIC — Earlier EU figurative marks BiG, BANCO BiG and BiGlobal TRADE — Earlier national word marks BANCO BIG and earlier national figurative mark BANCO BiG — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0126: Case T-126/21: Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2023 — Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission (Dumping — Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duties — Request for an expiry review — Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Article 5(3) and (9) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Legal time limit — Sufficiency of the evidence — Deficiency procedure — Information submitted outside the legal time limit)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0127: Case T-127/21 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2026 – Swissgrid v Commission (Energy – European platforms for the exchange of standard products for balancing energy – Switzerland’s participation – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – Letter from the Commission refusing to authorise the Swiss transmission system operator to participate in the platforms – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Continuing interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Lack of competence of the author of the act)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0131: Zadeva T-131/21: Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 21. junija 2023 – Região Autónoma da Madeira/Komisija (Državne pomoči – Shema pomoči, ki jo je izvajala Portugalska – Prosta cona Madeira – Sklep o ugotovitvi neskladnosti sheme s sklepoma C(2007) 3037 final in C(2013) 4043 final, o razglasitvi te sheme za nezdružljivo z notranjim trgom in o odreditvi izterjave pomoči, ki so bile plačane na podlagi te sheme – Ničnostna tožba – Procesno upravičenje – Dopustnost – Pojem „državna pomoč“ – Veljavna pomoč v smislu člena 1(b)(ii) Uredbe (EU) 2015/1589 – Izterjava – Legitimno pričakovanje – Pravna varnost – Načelo dobrega upravljanja – Absolutna nemožnost izpolnitve – Zastaranje – Člen 17 Uredbe 2015/1589)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0132: Case T-132/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO (LOOP) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark LOOP — Partial rejection of the application for registration — Absolute grounds of refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the products and services — Sufficiently direct and specific relationship — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0134: Case T-134/21: Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2024 – Malacalza Investimenti and Malacalza v ECB (Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Decisions taken by the European Central Bank (ECB) concerning Banca Carige – Articles 4 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Legitimate expectations – Conflict of interests – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Plea of illegality)

RSS
First213214215216218220221222Last
Please edit and save settings.