Išči

BAZA ZNANJA

Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)

CELEX:62023TJ0263_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Symrise AG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Subject matter and purpose of the inspection – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Protection of privacy.#Case T-263/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0338_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Mobility Trader Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark hey car select – Earlier national figurative mark geicar vehículos seminuevos y de ocasión – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-338/24.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0040_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO ‘Port’ – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-40/24.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0023_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Quevedo Port – Earlier PDO ‘Porto/Port’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-23/24.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0095_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Laura Food Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE VERT DE CHINE 4011 ALJAMAL ALJAMAL 4011 B 552 – Earlier EU figurative marks 4011 B 552 and 4011 B 552 TE VERDE DI CINA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-95/24.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0241_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH, anciennement Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus CardControl and figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regu

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0272_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-272/24.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62023TJ1108_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit received from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-1108/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CJ0368:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#Commission européenne contre République hellénique.#Manquement d’État – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Inexécution – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Environnement – Directives 2008/98/CE et 1999/31/CE – Déchets – Décharge sur l’île de Zakynthos (Grèce) – Obligation de désaffecter cette décharge n’ayant pas obtenu l’autorisation requise – Sanctions pécuniaires – Astreinte – Somme forfaitaire.#Affaire C-368/24.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62023CJ0798: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Minister for Justice v SH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 4a(1) – Surrender procedure between Member States – European arrest warrant – Conditions for execution – Grounds for optional non-execution – Mandatory execution – Exceptions – Concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’ – Additional sentence of police supervision – Breach of the conditions imposed in connection with that supervision – Decision converting police supervision into a custodial sentence – Sentence handed down in absentia.#Case C-798/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CJ0416:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL contre Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Règlement (UE) no 651/2014 – Exemption de certaines catégories d’aides compatibles avec le marché intérieur – Erreur de traduction dans la version en langue roumaine de ce règlement – Effets juridiques du règlement rectifiant cette erreur – Possibilité de récupération d’une aide octroyée avant la rectification dans le respect des conditions énoncées dans la version du règlement contenant l’erreur de traduction – Protection de la confiance légitime – Sécurité juridique.#Affaire C-416/24.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62024CJ0080:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#Zwrotybankowe.pl sp. z o.o. contre Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrats de crédit aux consommateurs – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 22, paragraphe 2 – Caractère impératif de cette directive – Cession au bénéfice d’un tiers par un consommateur de sa créance à l’égard d’une banque – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Examen d’office par le juge national du caractère abusif des clauses d’un contrat de cession de créance ne faisant pas l’objet du litige pendant devant ce juge.#Affaire C-80/24.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62024CJ0540:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Erste Kammer) vom 9. Oktober 2025.#Cabris lnvestments Ltd gegen Revetas Capital Advisors LLP.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und Vollstreckung von Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1215/2012 – Anwendungsbereich – Art. 25 – Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung – In demselben Drittstaat ansässige Vertragsparteien – Zuweisung der Zuständigkeit der Gerichte eines Mitgliedstaats für Rechtsstreitigkeiten aus diesem Vertrag – Auslandsbezug – Folgen des Austritts des Vereinigten Königreichs Großbritannien und Nordirland aus der Europäischen Union.#Rechtssache C-540/24.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62024CJ0551:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG contre AirHelp Germany GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 7, point 1, sous b), second tiret – Compétence spéciale en matière contractuelle – Détermination de la juridiction compétente – Contrat de transport aérien conclu entre un consommateur et un professionnel – Créance indemnitaire du passager découlant d’un vol retardé – Cession de cette créance à une société de recouvrement de créances – Recours en indemnisation dirigé par le cessionnaire contre le transporteur aérien devant la juridiction du lieu de départ de l’avion – Lieu d’exécution de l’obligation qui sert de base à la demande – Lieu d’un État membre où

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more
RSS
1345678910Last
Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij