Išči

BAZA ZNANJA

Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)

CELEX:62024CA0151: Case C-151/24, Luevi: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale – Italy) – Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v V.M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Third-country national – Residence permit for family reasons – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Concept of branches of social security – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Social allowance for the elderly living in indigence – Conditions for granting – Exclusion of third-country nationals who do not hold an EU residence p

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0489: Case C-489/24, Safita: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State – Netherlands) – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v X (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Possibility to extend the six-month time limit for taking a decision in the event of a large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Successive extension decisions – Conditions and limits – Article 4(1) – Obligation for Member States to ensure that the determining authority is provided with appropriate means to carry out its tasks)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0613: Case C-613/24: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 – European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 260(2) TFEU – Judgment of the Court finding a failure to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Wild fauna and flora – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 4(4) – Annexes I and II – Sites of Community importance – Special areas of conservation – Failure to designate – Article 6(1) – Necessary conservation measures – Failure to adopt – Failure to comply with the judgment of the Court – Financial penalties – Lump sum – Penalty payment)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0757: Case C-757/24, Gemeinde Wien: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien- Austria) – SG v Gemeinde Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Regional legislation on the remuneration of contract staff members – Periods of employment completed before the age of 18 taken into account – New remuneration system replacing previous legislation found to be discriminatory)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62025TA0017: Case T-17/25: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2026 – Team Beverage v EUIPO – Zurich Deutscher Herold Lebensversicherung (TEAM BEVERAGE) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – EU figurative mark TEAM BEVERAGE – Earlier EU word mark TEAM – Request for suspension of the administrative proceedings – Rejection – Article 71(1)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0436: Case C-436/24, Lyko Operations: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen – Sweden) – Skatteverket v Lyko Operations AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30a – Supply of goods – Concept of voucher – Classification – Customer loyalty programme in the form of points awarded on the basis of previous purchases – Points which may be redeemed for products of low value)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62025CA0010: Case C-10/25, Elettronica Industriale: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio – Italy) – Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fees for rights of use for digital television frequencies – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 8 – General objectives – Proportionality – Criterion for assessing fees linked to the collection of a predetermined amount of annual revenue with a financial objective)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0747_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#KH contre Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Statut conféré par la protection subsidiaire – Directive 2011/95/UE – Article 26 – Accès à l’emploi – Article 29 – Protection sociale – Égalité de traitement – Mesure de protection sociale et d’accès à l’emploi – Condition de résidence de dix ans minimum, dont les deux dernières années de manière continue – Discrimination indirecte.#Affaire C-747/22.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62024CJ0636:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Sara Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-636/24 P.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62024CJ0635:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Kinda Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-635/24 P.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62024CJ0637:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#Ghada Mhana contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises à l’égard de la République arabe syrienne – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription du nom de la requérante sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-637/24 P.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62025CO0516: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) and Bernard O'Connor v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public access to documents of the EU institutions – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4 – Exceptions to the right of access – Request for access to certain documents relating to an application for registration of a name as a protected geographical indication – Partial refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings.#Case C-516/25 P.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0747:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 7 mai 2026.#KH contre Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Statut conféré par la protection subsidiaire – Directive 2011/95/UE – Article 26 – Accès à l’emploi – Article 29 – Protection sociale – Égalité de traitement – Mesure de protection sociale et d’accès à l’emploi – Condition de résidence de dix ans minimum, dont les deux dernières années de manière continue – Discrimination indirecte.#Affaire C-747/22.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First45679111213Last
Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
Želim več informacij